AI相關之專利審查實務

AI相關之專利審查實務

背景

  • 在2022年06月所舉辦會議中,五大專利局承諾推動NET/AI專案 “蒐集五大專利局中與AI相關專利之現行審查實務資料、及其網站中所公告資料”。
  • 本專案目的在於,藉由提供五大專利局對於AI相關專利之審查實務概況,協助申請人掌握申請AI相關專利時所需注意的要點,進一步能於多個國家中順利取得專利權。
  • 本專案範疇為彙整五大專利局之相關法條及資訊,包含了各專利局之審查章節、審查基準、案例等與AI相關專利於各專利局審查時所適用的重點資訊。

蒐集現行資料結果

  • 作為一主導腳色,日本專利局寄出關於此專案之問卷,並已獲得其他專利局回覆。
  • 為避免資訊過時,提供網站資料連結與以下資訊。使用者可以於日後透過網站連結擷取最新資訊。
  • 五大專利局之完整回覆,如附件。
  • 五大專利局之回覆摘要列表,於下一頁呈現。

免責聲明:

所提供數據資料旨在強調五大專利局與AI專利相關之審查實務,但其內容於各種形式上皆不必然被視為或推斷為具有法律效力。五大專利局並不擔保其所提供之資料於某特定用途之完整、精確及適用性。

Q1. 請提供最新專利法之網站連結
EPOThe European Patent Convention[English] [German] [French]
JPOPatent Act[English] [Japanese]
KIPOPatent Act[English] [Korean]
CNIPOPatent Law of the People’s  Republic of China [Chinese]
Rules for the Implementation of  the Patent Law of the People’s  Republic of China[English] [Chinese]
USPTOUnited States Code Title 35 –  Patents [English]
Q2.貴局對於AI相關之專利的審查標準及相關適用法規等材料有哪些?
[特點]材料特別說明AI相關專利之審查實務及標準材料說明軟體相關專利之審查實務及標準,包含與AI相關者材料說明所有技術領域之審查實務及標準其他
EPOGuidelines for examination in the  European Patent Office (2022)  [English[German[French [Feature: 1, 2, 3]
Section G-II, 3.3.1 of the  Guidelines for examination in the  European Patent Office (2022)  [English[German[French [Feature: 1]
Index for Computer-Implemented  Inventions containing links to  sections of Guidelines relating  particularly to CIIs
[English] [German] [French [Feature: 1, 2, 3]
Case Law of the Boards of  Appeal of the European Patent  Office, 10th Edition, July 2022  [English[German[French [Feature: 1, 2, 3, 4]
Opinion G 3/08 of the Enlarged  Board of Appeal dealing with the  patentability of computer programs
[English[German[French [Feature: 2]
Decision G 1/19 of the Enlarged  Board of Appeal on computer-  implemented simulations  [English[German[French [Feature: 2]
JPOExamination Guidelines for  Patent and Utility Model in Japan  [English] [Feature: 3]
Examination Handbook for Patent  and Utility Model, Annex B,  Chapter 1, Computer software  related Inventions[English] [Feature: 2]
Outline of the Examination  Guidelines for Patent and Utility  Model[English] [Feature: 3]
Newly Added Case Examples for  AI-related Technologies  [English] [Feature: 1]
Examination Guidelines in  Manga: AI/IoT Edition  [English] [Feature: 2]
Points of Revision of the  Examination Guidelines and  Examination Handbook for  Computer Software-Related  Inventions
[English] [Feature: 2]
Examination Guidelines pertinent  to IoT related technologies  [English] [Feature: 2]
Case Examples pertinent to AI-  related technologies[English] [Feature: 1]
Case examples pertinent to IoT  related technology, etc.  [English] [Feature: 2]
Explanation of Examination  Guidelines and Examination  Handbook for Computer  Software-Related Inventions  [Japanese] [Feature: 2]
KIPOExamination practice guide by  technology field[Korean] [Feature: 1, 2]
Patent Examination Guideline  [English] [Korean] [Feature: 3]
CNIPOGuidelines for Patent  Examination (2010)[Chinese] [Feature: 3]
The Order of Amending  Guidelines for Patent  Examination (No.74)  [Chinese] [Feature: 2]
The Announcement of Amending  Guidelines for Patent  Examination (No.343)[Chinese] [Feature: 1]
USPTOManual of Patent Examining  Procedure[English] [Feature: 3]
Chapter 2106, 2161-2166, 2181-2186 of Manual of Patent  Examining Procedure  [English] [Feature: 2]
AI-related patent resources  [English] [Feature: 1]
AI Policy Report  [English] [Feature: 2, 3]
Q3.貴局是否與其他專利局合作對於AI相關之專利的審查實務及標準進行比較研析?
[特點]1.比較研析聚焦於AI相關專利之審查實務及標準 2.比較研析聚焦於軟體相關專利之審查實務及標準,包含與AI相關者
EPO[EPO & KIPO]
Comparative study on computer-  implemented inventions/software-  related inventions (2021)
[English] [Feature: 2]
[EPO & JPO]
Comparative study on computer-  implemented inventions/software-  related inventions (2021)
[English] [Feature: 2]
[EPO & CNIPA]
Comparative study on computer-  implemented inventions/software-  related inventions (2019)
[English] [Feature: 2]
JPO[JPO & EPO]
Comparative Study on Computer  Implemented Inventions/Software  related Inventions
[English] [Japanese[Feature: 2]
[Five IP Offices]  International Symposium on Patent Examination Practices on  AI-related Inventions
[English] [Japanese[Feature: 1]
[EPO, JPO & USPTO]
Report on Comparative Study  Carried Out Under Trilateral  Project 24.2
[English] [Feature: 2]
KIPO[EPO & KIPO]
Comparative study on computer-  implemented inventions/software  related inventions
[English] [Korean[Feature: 2]
CNIPO[EPO & CNIPA]
Comparative study on computer  implemented inventions/software  related inventions
[Chinese] [English[Feature: 2]
USPTON/A
Q4. 關於專利適格性之法規規定?
EPOArt. 52 EPC[English] [German] [French]
JPOMain Paragraph of Article 29(1)  of Patent Act[English] [Japanese]
KIPOArticle 2, Article 29(1) and Article  32 of Patent Act[English] [Korean]
CNIPOArticle 2, Article 5 and Article 25  of Patent Law of PRC.  [Chinese]
USPTO35 U.S.C. 101[English]
Q5. 若有評估AI相關專利之專利適格性的審查指南或其他資料,請列出
EPOGuidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office (2022)
[Index for Computer-  Implemented Inventions]
[G-I] [G-II, 1 ] [G-II, 2][G-II, 3.3] [G-II, 3.3.1
[G-II, 3.3.2][G-II, 3.5[G-II, 3.6[G-II, 3.7]
JPOExamination Handbook for Patent and Utility Model, Annex B  [Chapter 1, Section 2.1]
KIPOExamination practice guide by  technology field
[Pages 1301~1310, 7301~7306]
CNIPOThe Announcement of Amending Guidelines for Patent  Examination (No.343)
[Section 6.1.1 and 6.1.2.]
USPTOManual of Patent Examining  Procedure[2106 Patent Subject Matter Eligibility]
The Subject Matter Eligibility  webpage [Link]
Q6. 若評估AI或軟體相關專利之專利適格性的審查指南或其他資料中,有列舉可被接受、不可被接受之專利主體、或專利範圍撰寫形式者,請列出
EPOGuidelines for Examination in the  European Patent Office (2022)  
[G-II, 3.3[G-II, 3.3.1][G-II 3.3.2] [G-II, 3.5.1][G-II, 3.5.2]
[G-II, 3.5.3][G-II 3.6] [G-II 3.6.1][G-II 3.6.2] [G-II 3.6.3]
[G-II 3.6.4] [G-II 3.7][G-II 3.7.1] [G-VII, 5.4][G-VII, 5.4.1]
[G-VII, 5.4.2][F-IV, 3.9] [F-IV, 3.9.1][F-IV, 3.9.2] [F-IV, 3.9.3]
Case Law of the Boards of  Appeal of the European Patent  Office, 10th Edition, July 2022  
[I.A.2.2.2] [I.A.2.4][I.A.2.5] [I.A.2.6]
JPOExamination Handbook for Patent  and Utility Model, Annex B  [Chapter 1, Section 2.1.2]
KIPOExamination practice guide by  technology field
[Pages 1205~1211, 1301~1310,  6203~6204, 7301~7306, 55~76]
CNIPOThe Announcement of Amending  Guidelines for Patent  Examination (No.343)[Section 6.2, Exmaple 1~6]
The Order of Amending  Guidelines for Patent  Examination (No.74)  [Section 2, 3, 4]
Guidelines for Patent  Examination (2010), Part 2  [Chapter 9, Section 2 [Chapter 9, Section 3 [Chapter 9, Section 5.2]
USPTOManual of Patent Examining  Procedure
[2106.03 Eligibility Step 1: The  Four Categories of Statutory  Subject Matter]
The Subject Matter Eligibility  webpage [Link]
Q7. 為了能理解如何評估AI相關專利之專利適格性,若有任何相關案例,請提供
[結論]1.符合專利適格性的案例 2.不符合專利適格性的案例
EPODecision T 1173/97 of the Boards  of Appeal [Link] [Summary: 1]
Decision T 1820/16 of Technical  Board of Appeal [Link] [Summary: 2]
Hypothetical example of applying  the COMVIK approach (GL G-  VII, 5.4.2.5) [Link] [Summary: 1]
JPOExamination Handbook for Patent  and Utility Model, Annex B
[Case 2-13[Summary: 1]  [Case 2-14] [Summary: 1]
Examination Handbook for Patent  and Utility Model, Annex A
[Case 3-2] [Summary: 1, 2]
KIPOExamination practice guide by  technology field
[Pages 1301~1310, 7301~7306][Summary: 1, 2]
CNIPOThe Announcement of Amending  Guidelines for Patent Examination  (No.343), Section 6.2
[Example 2,3,4[Summary: 1]  [Example 1,5,6] [Summary: 2]
USPTOThe Subject Matter Eligibility  webpage
[Example 36[Summary: 1, 2]  [Example 39] [Summary: 1]
Q8. 專利中法中對於說明書規定的相關法條? 1.明確性 2.支持性要求或說明書撰寫規定 3.可據以實施性或揭露充分性
EPO1Art. 84 EPC[English] [German] [French]
2Art. 84 EPC[English] [German] [French]
3Art. 83 EPC[English] [German] [French]
JPO1Article 36(6)(ii)  [English] [Japanese]
2Article 36(6)(i)  [English] [Japanese]
3Article 36(4)(i)  [English] [Japanese]
KIPO[1] Article 42(4)2  [English] [Korean]
[2] Article 42(3)2, 42(4)1[English] [Korean]
[3] Article 42(3)1  [English] [Korean]
CNIPO1Paragraph 3 of Article 26  [Chinese]
2Paragraph 4 of Article 26  [Chinese]
3Paragraph 3 of Article 26  [Chinese]
USPTO[1] 35 U.S.C. 112(b)[English]
[2] 35 U.S.C. 112(a)[English]
[3] 35 U.S.C. 112(a)[English]
Q9. 若有評估AI相關專利之明確性的審查指南或其他資料,請列出
EPOGuidelines for Examination in the  European Patent Office (2022) 
[F-IV] [F-IV, 3.9[F-IV, 3.9.1][F-IV, 3.9.2] [F-IV, 3.9.3]
JPOExamination Handbook for Patent  and Utility Model, Annex B
[Chapter 1, Section 1.2.1]
KIPOExamination practice guide by  technology field
[Pages 1205~1211, 6203~6204,  7206~7208, 7402~7407]
CNIPOGuidelines for Patent  Examination (2010), Part 2  [Chapter 2, Section 2.1.1 [Chapter 9, Section 5.1]
The Announcement of Amending  Guidelines for Patent  Examination (No.343)[Section 6.3.1 and 6.3.2]
USPTO[Manual of Patent Examining  Procedure
[2171 Two Separate  Requirements for Claims]
Q10. 若有評估AI相關專利之支持性要求或說明書撰寫規定的審查指南或其他資料,請列出
EPOGuidelines for Examination in the  European Patent Office (2022)  [F-IV, 6[F-II, 4.12]
JPOExamination Handbook for Patent  and Utility Model, Annex A[Case 49] [Case 50] [Case 51]
Newly Added Case Examples for  AI-related Technologies[Page 10]
KIPOExamination practice guide by  technology field[Pages 1204~1205]
CNIPOGuidelines for Patent  Examination (2010), Part 2  [Chapter 2, Section 3.2.1 [Chapter 9, Section 5.1~5.2 ]
The Order of Amending  Guidelines for Patent  Examination (No.74)  [Part 4 of the amendment]
USPTOManual of Patent Examining  Procedure
[2163 “Written Description”  Requirement ]
Q11.若有評估AI相關專利之可據以實施性或揭露充分性的審查指南或其他資料,請列出
EPOGuidelines for Examination in the  European Patent Office (2022)  [F-III, 1, par. 4]
JPOExamination Handbook for Patent  and Utility Model, Annex B  [Chapter 1, Section 1.1.1 ]
KIPOExamination practice guide by  technology field
[Pages 1201~1204, 6201~6203,  7201~7206, 7401~7402]
CNIPOGuidelines for Patent  Examination (2010), Part 2  [Chapter 2, Section 2.1.3 [Chapter 9, Section 5.1~5.2]
The Order of Amending  Guidelines for Patent  Examination (No.74)  [Part 4 of the amendment]
USPTOManual of Patent Examining  Procedure[2164 The Enablement  Requirement]
Q12.若有可評估利用AI技術結合人為發展出的產品相關專利之支持性要求/說明書撰寫規定、或可據以實施性/揭露充分性的審查指南或其他資料,請列出
EPOGuidelines for Examination in the  European Patent Office (2022)  [F-IV, 4.12[F-III, 4] [F-III, 12]
JPOExamination Handbook for Patent  and Utility Model, Annex A[Case 51]
KIPOExamination practice guide by  technology field
[Pages 1201~1205, 3402~3403,  3502~3511]
CNIPON/A
USPTOExamination Guidance and  Training Materials | USPTO
Q13. 為了能理解如何評估AI相關專利之說明書撰寫規定,若有任何相關案例,請提供
[結論]1.符合明確性的案例 2.不符合明確性的案例
3.符合可據以實施性/揭露充分性的案例不符合可據以實施性/揭露充分性的案例符合支持性要求/說明書撰寫的案例不符合支持性要求/說明書撰寫的案例
EPODecision T 410/96 of the Boards  of Appeal [Link[Summary: 1]
Decision T 2140/08 of the Boards  of Appeal [Link] [Summary: 2]
Decision T 161/18 of the Boards  of Appeal [Link[Summary: 4]
Decision T 2574/16 of the Boards  of Appeal [Link[Summary: 1,3]
Decision T 637/03 of the Boards  of Appeal [Link[Summary: 6]
JPOExamination Handbook for Patent  and Utility Model, Annex A
[Case 46] [Summary: 4][Case 47] [Summary: 3]  [Case 48] [Summary: 3] 
[Case 49] [Summary: 3,4,5,6][Case 50[Summary: 3,4,5,6]  [Case 51] [Summary: 4,6]
KIPOExamination practice guide by  technology field
[Chapter 1, Case 1 (Pages  1403~1407)] [Summary: 4,6]
[Chapter 6, Case 1~7 (Pages  6401~6419)] [Summary: 3,4]
[Chapter 7, Case 2 (Pages  7504~7506)] [Summary: 4]
CNIPON/A
USPTON/A
Q14. 專利中法中對於新穎性規定的相關法條?
EPOArt. 54 EPC[English] [German] [French]
JPOArticle 29(1)  [English] [Japanese]
KIPOArticle 29(1)  [English] [Korean]
CNIPOParagraph 2 of Article 22  [Chinese]
USPTO35 U.S.C. 102[English]
Q15. 若有可評估AI相關專利之新穎性的審查指南或其他資料,請列出
EPOGuidelines for Examination in the  European Patent Office (2022)  [G-VI]
Case Law of the Boards of  Appeal of the European Patent  Office, 10th Edition, July 2022  [I.C.1-5]
JPOExamination Handbook for Patent  and Utility Model, Annex B  [Chapter 1, Section 2.2.2]
KIPOExamination practice guide by  technology field[Pages 1311~1324]
CNIPOGuidelines for Patent  Examination (2010), Part 2  [Chapter 3, Section 3]
The Announcement of Amending  Guidelines for Patent  Examination (No.343)[Section 6.1.3]
USPTOManual of Patent Examining  Procedure[2120 Rejection on Prior Art]  [2131 Anticipation – Application  of 35 U.S.C. 102]
Q16. 為了能理解如何評估AI相關專利之新穎性規定,若有任何相關案例,請提供
[結論]1.符合新穎性規定的案例 2.因新穎性被駁回的案例
EPODecision T 2440/12 of the Boards  of Appeal [Link] [Summary: 2]
JPON/A
KIPON/A
CNIPON/A
USPTON/A
Q17. 專利中法中對於進步性規定的相關法條?
EPOArt. 56 EPC[English] [German] [French]
JPOArticle 29(2)  [English] [Japanese]
KIPOArticle 29(2)  [English] [Korean]
CNIPOParagraph 3 of Article 22  [Chinese]
USPTO35 U.S.C. 103[English]
Q18. 若有可評估AI相關專利之進步性的審查指南或其他資料,請列出
EPOGuidelines for Examination in the  European Patent Office[G-VII, 5.4] [G-VII, 5.4.1][G-VII, 5.4.2]
Case Law of the Boards of  Appeal of the European Patent  Office, 10th Edition, July 2022  [I.D.9.1] [I.D.9.2]
JPOExamination Handbook for Patent and Utility Model, Annex B  [Chapter 1, Section 2.2.3]
KIPOExamination practice guide by  technology field
[Pages 1311~1324, 6301~6302,  7306~7316]
CNIPOGuidelines for Patent
Examination (2010), Part 2  [Chapter 4, Section 3]
The Announcement of Amending  Guidelines for Patent  Examination (No.343)[Section 6.1.3]
USPTOManual of Patent Examining  Procedure
[2141 Examination Guidelines for  Determining Obviousness]
Q19. 為了能理解如何評估AI相關專利之進步性規定,若有任何相關案例,請提供
[結論]1.符合進步性規定的案例 2.因進步性被駁回的案例 3.其他
EPODecision T 1286/09 of  the Boards of Appeal[Link] [Summary: 1]
Decision G 1/19 of the Enlarged  Board of Appeal[Link] [Summary: 3]
EPO-JPO Comparative study on  computer-implemented  inventions/software-related  inventions (2021)[Case C-8] [Summary: 2]
JPOExamination Handbook for Patent  and Utility Model, Annex A
[Case 31[Summary: 2]  [Case 32[Summary: 2]  [Case 33[Summary: 2]  
[Case 34[Summary: 1, 2] [Case 35[Summary: 2] [Case 36] [Summary: 1]
Examination Handbook for Patent  and Utility Model, Annex B,  Chapter 1, Section 2.2.3.3 
[Example 1[Summary: 2] [Example 2[Summary: 2]  [Example 4[Summary: 1]  [Example 5] [Summary: 1]
KIPOExamination practice guide by  technology field
[Chapter 1, Case 2~5 (Pages  1407~1432)][Summary: 1, 2]
[Chapter 6, Case 8~18 (Pages  6420~6444)][Summary: 1, 2]
[Chapter 7, Case 3, 5, 6 (Pages  7507~7510, 7515~7522)][Summary: 1, 2]
CNIPOThe Announcement of Amending  Guidelines for Patent  Examination (No.343)
[Example 7, 9] [Summary: 1][Example 8, 10 8, 10] [Summary: 2]
USPTON/A

總結

  • 五大專利局皆提供關於AI相關專利之專利適格性案例。(請見Q7)
  • EPO, JPO 及 KIPO提供關於AI相關專利說明書規定案例。(請見Q13)
  • EPO提供一關於AI相關專利新穎性規定案例。(請見Q16)
  • EPO, JPO, KIPO及CNIPA提供關於AI相關專利進步性規定案例 (請見Q19)
  • 對於處理AI技術相關專利,EPO, JPO及CNIPA對於AI相關專利的審查,提出了審查指南等資料的相關章節或案例。KIPO則有AI相關技術領域專章的審查基準。USIPO發布了網站資訊蒐集與AI相關專利資訊。(請見Q2)